Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Higher Education Quality Assurance Policies: Exploring Vision, Governance, and Teaching Practices in Advancing SDG-4 in Pakistan

Authors

  • Dr. Sumaira Munawar Associate Professor, Department of Education, Lahore Leads University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Shaheera Zulfiqar PhD Scholar, Department of Education, Lahore Leads University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/tk/v5i1.51161

Keywords:

Quality Assurance, Higher Education, SDG-4, Governance, Pakistan

Abstract

The study aimed to delve into the views of different stakeholders on the quality assurance (QA) policies in the context of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG-4) in Pakistan. The study reviewed the institutional vision, mission, and strategic planning for equitable access to tertiary education, the governance, leadership, and organizational structures that fostered equitable quality education, and the teaching and learning approaches that provided equitable quality learning experiences. A qualitative phenomenological approach was used, and data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and document analysis with the university administration, faculty members, Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) officials, and policy makers of selected universities in Pakistan. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the collected data. The findings showed that institutions started to engage with SDG-4 via inclusive policies, involving stakeholders, integrating SDG-4 into curriculum, and using student-centered approaches in teaching. But quality assurance mechanisms in higher education institutions were not effective due to various challenges, including limited resources and policy inconsistencies.

References

Beerkens, M. (2015). Quality assurance in the political context: In the midst of different expectations and conflicting goals. Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1111004

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fazil, H., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Navigating Pakistan’s educational policy landscape in pursuit of Sustainable Devement Goal 4: A view of stakeholders. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(3), 510–525. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-III)44

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.

Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2018). Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 24(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538321003679457

Khan, M. K., & Azhar, M. M. (2024). Advancing Sustainable Development Goals through Educational Governance in Higher Education Institutions: Bridging Policy and Practice for Punjab, Pakistan. Orient Research Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 119-132

Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L., Molthan-Hill, P., & Pace, P. (2021). Sustainable development goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309

Leisyte, L., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2014). Stakeholders and quality assurance in higher education. In Drivers and barriers to achieving quality in higher education (pp. 83-97). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

Lim, D. (2018). Quality assurance in higher education: A study of developing countries: A study of developing countries. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204147

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Rini, P. P., Sudadio, S., & Muhyidin, A. (2025). Quality assurance in higher education: Best practices, challenges, and future directions. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.869

Saani, H. H. R., & Saeed, M. (2025). Exploring implementation challenges in sustaining quality assurance: A qualitative study in universities of district Lahore. Annals of Human and Social Sciences 6(3), 717–730. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2025(6-III)60

Sain, Z. H., Abdullah, N. B., & Hidayat, M. T. (2024). Sustainable pathways to quality: Exploring SDG 4’s influence on higher education transformation in Pakistan. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(4), 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v8i4.8923

Shah, M., & Sid Nair, C. (2014). Turning the ship around: Rethinking strategy development and implementation in universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 22(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-03-2012-0016

Shoukat, S., Usman, Z., & Fatima, M. (2024). Quality assurance frameworks in higher education: A comparative approach between developed and developing countries. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(3), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-III)25

Tanveer, M., Mahmood, H., Haq, I. U., Rather, R. A., & Ali, H. (2021). Higher education quality assurance framework pathway for transformation in Pakistan: Managerial and economic perspectives (MPRA Paper No. 109253). Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/109253/

UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Munawar, S., & Zulfiqar, S. (2026). Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Higher Education Quality Assurance Policies: Exploring Vision, Governance, and Teaching Practices in Advancing SDG-4 in Pakistan. The Knowledge, 5(1), 384-396. https://doi.org/10.55737/tk/v5i1.51161