Analysis Regarding the Social Justice Model in Respect to Democracy at Secondary School Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/tk/v5i1.51137Keywords:
Social Justice Model, Democracy, Secondary Schools, Education, Khyber PakhtunkhwaAbstract
This paper examines how the social justice model is perceived by the stakeholders in reference to the democracy in the secondary schools in southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Under the descriptive design, data was sampled by using a stratified sampling of principals, teachers, and students using 7-point Likert scale questionnaire. Descriptive statistics analysis, t-tests, and ANOVA were conducted to compare the results across gender, locality and stakeholder groups. The results indicate a wide urban-rural gap: urban stakeholders had much more positive views of social justice and teacher involvement than the rural ones. There were no statistically significant effects with gender and no significant differences raised between the three stakeholder groups according to professional roles. The geographical location has become the most important factor, not gender or professional title, to form the perceptions. The rural stakeholders continued to give low mean scores, which reflected their dissatisfaction with teacher involvement and democratic education in their schools. Such outcomes indicate that context-specific education policies that cover structural inequalities between urban and rural communities are necessary. The recommendations will be based on equal distributions of resources, professional development targeted to rural educators, and interventions to address the unique issues facing communities in the rural schools in the area.
References
Akhtar, M. Z., Zaman, K., & Khan, M. A. (2024). Governance, foreign investment, and growth: The impact of governance indicators, foreign direct investment, economic expansion, and industrialization on carbon emissions. SN Business & Economics, 4(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00743-1
Arshad, M., & Ahmad, S. (2025). Within-group and between-group variance patterns in South Asian educational leadership contexts. Journal of Educational Policy and Leadership Studies, 18(1), 45–59.
Azam, A., Khattak, M. U., & Ul Ain, Q. (2025). A comprehensive assessment of Pakistan’s national internal security policy framework. Global Change, Peace & Security, 36(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2025.2474242
Baharuddin, & Burhan. (2025). Urban and rural teacher perspectives on Indonesian educational reform: Challenges and policy implications. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2497142
Bernstein, S. (2000). undefined. European Journal of International Relations, 6(4), 464-512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006004002
Cochran-Smith, M. (2023). Teacher education for equity and social justice: What's learning got to do with it? Teachers College Press.
Cohen, W. M. (2010). Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 129-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01004-X
Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). The civil rights road to deeper learning: A blueprint for educational equity. Teachers College Press.
Darling‐Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of ‘No Child Left Behind’. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320701503207
Durrani, N., & Halai, A. (2018). Dynamics of gender justice, conflict and social cohesion: Analysing educational reforms in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Development, 61, 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.11.010
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (Herder and Herder, New York). New York: Herder & Herder.
García-Carmona, M., Romero-Freire, A., Aragón, M. S., Garzón, F. M., & Peinado, F. M. (2017). Evaluation of remediation techniques in soils affected by residual contamination with heavy metals and arsenic. Journal of Environmental Management, 191, 228-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.041
Gorski, P. S. (2000). Historicizing the secularization debate: Church, state, and society in late medieval and early modern Europe, Ca. 1300 to 1700. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657295
Hackman, J. V., Campbell, B. C., Hewlett, B., Page, A. E., & Kramer, K. L. (2024). Adipose development is consistent across hunter–gatherers and diverges from western references. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 291(2029). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.0110
Hargreaves, L., Kvalsund, R., & Galton, M. (2009). Reviews of research on rural schools and their communities in British and nordic countries: Analytical perspectives and cultural meaning. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.001
Hytten, K., & Bettez, S. C. (2011). Understanding education for social justice. Educational foundations, 25, 7-24.
Khan, N., Azam, I., & Khaliq, H. B. A. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Public and Private Universities’ Performance in the QS Ranking System in Pakistan (2020–2024). Social Science Review Archives, 3(3), 2011-2016. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i3.1041
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American educational research journal, 32(3), 465-491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Mills, C., & Ballantyne, J. (2016). Social justice and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116660152
Pantić, N., & Florian, L. (2015). Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Education Inquiry, 6(3), 27311. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.27311
Rahman, A., Khan, T., & Bilal, M. (2024). Contextual influences on perceptions of social justice in South Asian school systems. International Journal of Social Justice in Education, 12(2), 88–104.
Santafé, A. C. V., Cedeño, M. M. P., Mayorga, J. I. M., & Campoverde, G. A. A. (2025). Multivariate Analysis of Educational Inclusion According to Teacher Participation and Student Perception in Rural and Urban Contexts. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S2 (2025): Posted 09 June), 916-922. https://tpmap.org/submission/index.php/tpm/article/view/315
Wang, Y., Gao, J., Duan, Q., & Di, H. (2025). Impacts of rural revitalization on early childhood education in China: A triangulated stakeholder study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2025.2486813
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maimoona Majeed, Malik Amer Atta, Dr. Bushra Salahuddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Copyright in the THE KNOWLEDGE is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




