Role of Digital Tools for Enhancing Students Learning Outcomes at University Level

Authors

  • Ayesha Jahangir M.Phil. Scholar, Department of Education, University of Kotli, AJ&K, Pakistan.
  • Shamsa Kanwal M.Phil. Scholar, Department of Education, University of Kotli, AJ&K, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Sheraz Babar Phil. Scholar, Department of Education, University of Kotli, AJ&K, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Muhammad Naqeeb Ul Khalil Shaheen Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Kotli, AJ&K, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/tk/2k25d.44112

Keywords:

Digital Tools, Learning Outcomes, Digital Resources, Academic Achievement

Abstract

The scenario in higher learning institutions has changed dramatically due to the integration of cyber educational materials that enable better engagement and performance as well as development of analytical abilities among learners. The research emphasis is on digital tools and their significance in improving learners' performance at a higher educational institution. The research adopts a quantitative approach and involved a survey of 400 Bachelor of Science students from the University of Kotli Azad Jammu & Kashmir via a convenient sampling method. The research used a designed five-point likert scale questionnaire for data generation. The study population includes four thousand nine hundred Bachelor of Science students from all faculty members. The questionnaire consisted of four sections i.e. a) Demographic information, b) Use of digital tools, c) Learning outcomes, d) role of digital tools in enhancing students learning outcomes. The responses were analyzed by using different statistical techniques (mean and standard deviation) are calculated.  While the results indicate that students do use various digital tools, these technologies are not yet deeply or consistently embedded into the core curriculum. Higher order cognitive abilities like critical thinking and problem solving are also supported by digital tools.  Consequently, the study advocates for a more systematic integration of these tools across all academic departments.   

Author Biography

  • Dr. Muhammad Naqeeb Ul Khalil Shaheen, Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Kotli, AJ&K, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected]

References

Aivaz, K. A., & Teodorescu, D. (2022). College students’ distractions from learning caused by multitasking in online vs. face-to-face classes: A case study at a public University in Romania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811188

Chiu, T. K. (2021). A holistic approach to the design of artificial intelligence (AI) education for K-12 schools. TechTrends, 65(5), 796-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00637-1

Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1748

Correia, A.P., & Good, K. (2023). Exploring the relationships between student perceptions and educational technology utilization in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 16(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1601.05

Bagga, M. K., & Agrati, L. S. (2024). Editorial: Digitalization in education: developing tools for effective learning and personalisation of education. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1463596

de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science (New York, N.Y.), 340(6130), 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

Farhan, S. J., Rajab, S. R., & Abdusalam, M. (2021). A study of the impact of digital learning: Learning motivation and learning outcomes. Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 60(4), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v60i4.1839

Hu, P. J. H., & Hui, W. (2012). Examining the role of learning engagement in technologymediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness. Decision Support Systems, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.014

Kamalov, F., Santandreu-Calonge, D., &Gurrib, I. (2023). New Era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451

Mayrberger, K. (2017). Participatory learning with digital media: a perspective on the change of educational practice (PartizipativesLernenmitdigitalen Medien: Eine Perspektive auf die Veränderungpädagogischer Praxis). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-65817677-5

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307

Pye, G., Holt, D., Salzman, S., Bellucci, E., & Lombardi, L. (2015). Engaging diverse student audiences in contemporary blended learning environments in Australian higher business education: Implications for design and practice. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 19, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v19i0.1251

Uvarov, A. Y., Gable, E., Dvoretskaya, I. V., Zaslavsky, I. M., Karpov, I. A., & Mertsalova, T. A. (2019). Difficulties and prospects of digital transformation of education. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 344.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Jahangir, A., Kanwal, S., Babar, M. S., & Shaheen, M. N. U. K. (2025). Role of Digital Tools for Enhancing Students Learning Outcomes at University Level. The Knowledge, 4(4), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.55737/tk/2k25d.44112