Teacher Educators' Perspectives on Integrating AI Tools in Teacher Education Programs: A Symbolic Interactionist Study from Pakistani Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/tk/2k25c.43088Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Teacher Education, Symbolic Interactionism, Grounded Theory, Pakistan, Teacher Educators, Professional Development, Technology IntegrationAbstract
This qualitative research paper investigates how the teacher educators think using artificial intelligence (AI) tools used in pre-service teacher education programmes within the Pakistani universities in the light of an O'Donoghue grounded theory research approach, a symbolic interactionism approach. The paper also acquired a better understanding of how teacher educators conceptualize, enact, and mediate AI technologies towards proceeding with the course of pedagogical innovation. By using the constructivism method in the form of in-depth interviews with twenty-four teacher educators of state-run and private institutions in Punjab, the study examines the symbolic meaning of AI tools, the social mechanisms that support decision-making on the adoption of AI tools, and the nature of interaction between the teachers, students, and AI. The collection of data included semi-structured interviews, observation of participants in AI based instructional lessons and institutional policy frameworks. The comparative analysis of the data conducted indicated subtle negotiations between traditional pedagogical values and the development of technology and created concerns about authenticity, academic integrity, and the shift towards the identity of professionalism. The findings explain how teacher educators create a sense of meaning of AI implementation in the realms of social interaction, institutional pressure, and the culture in the context of Pakistani higher education. Consequently, the research will be able to supplement improved understanding of technology usage amongst teachers in the field of teacher education as well as offer conceptual frames that can be used in policy and professional development program development in some of the emerging economies.
References
Anwar, S., Muhammad, Y., & Bokhari, T. B. (2022). Teachers’ intentions & challenges concerning e-assessment at the virtual university of pakistan: A phenomenological study. Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review, 3(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol3-iss2-2022(92-101)
Berland, M., Baker, R. S., & Blikstein, P. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Applications to constructionist research. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9223-7
Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
Bokhari, D. T., Anis, D. F., & Muhammad, D. Y. (2025). Cultural contexts and methodological rigor: Examining the tensions in qualitative research pedagogy for special education in Pakistan. ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(2), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.63056/acad.004.02.0111
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2019). The sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory. Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed. ed.). Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2016). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In Developing grounded theory (pp. 127–193). Routledge.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Farooq, F., Muhammad, Y., & Mahmood, A. (2023). Effectiveness of storytelling in teaching qualitative research methods in zoom meetings: A phenomenological study. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 5(2), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v5i02.1209
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
Hammersley, M. (2023). Methodological concepts: A critical guide. Taylor & Francis.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Hoodbhoy, P. (1998). Education and the state: Fifty years of pakistan. Oxford University Press.
Hoodbhoy, P. (2017). Islam and science: Religious orthodoxy and the battle for rationality. Zed Books.
Imran, A., Muhammad, Y., & Waqar, Y. (2022). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of reflective teaching: A qualitative study. Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review, 3(3), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol3-iss3-2022(75-82)
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. UCL Knowledge Lab: London, UK.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Morse, J. M., Bowers, B. J., Charmaz, K., Clarke, A. E., Corbin, J., Porr, C. J., & Stern, P. N. (2021). Developing grounded theory: The second generation revisited. Taylor & Francis.
Muhammad, Y., Safdar, S., & Saif, S. (2024). Navigating the landscape of qualitative research methods in Pakistan: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13(2), 1144-1155. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.2.90
Muhammad, Y., Yasira Waqar, & Faisal Anis. (2024). Navigating complexity: Overcoming challenges in qualitative research for special education in Pakistan. Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 400-414. https://doi.org/10.58622/vjes.v4i2.169
Noor, M., Saleem, A., & Muhammad, Y. (2025). Examining pedagogical challenges: Novice teachers’ classroom management experiences in urban public elementary schools. Journal for Social Science Archives, 3(1), 440–451. https://doi.org/10.59075/jssa.v3i1.130
O'Donoghue, T. A. (2007). Planning your qualitative research project: an introduction to interpretivist research in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203967720
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization science, 11(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & research methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social studies of science, 14(3), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
Safdar, S., Mahmood, A., & Muhammad, Y. (2025). Beyond entertainment: Phenomenological insights into pakistani teacher candidates’ perceptions of video games as tools for digital citizenship education. Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, 3(4), 404–426. https://amresearchreview.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/69
Saleem, A., Fida, F., & Muhammad, Y. (2025). Factor analysis of the classroom management attitude scale: Dimensions of teacher perspectives. Indus Journalof Social Sciences, 3(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i1.581
Saleem, D. A., Liaqat, A., & Muhammad, D. Y. (2025). Developing emotion regulation competencies for Classroom Management: An analysis of pre-service Teachers in Punjab’s educational context. Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, 3(6), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.63075/td2rqj89
Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Waqar, Y., Urooj, T., Anis, F., & Muhammad, Y. (2025). Pedagogical, professional, and resource concerns: Understanding pre-service teachers' preparedness for inclusive education implementation. Research Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.59075/rjs.v3i1.59
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International journal of educational technology in higher education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
